Weekly Roundup, 23rd November 2020

Weekly Roundup, 23rd November 2020

We begin today’s Weekly Roundup with John Redwood in the FT.

Biden’s win

John Redwood

John Redwood’s ETF portfolio is overweight the US at the expense of the UK, Europe and Emerging markets.

  • Because of this, he’s up 6% YTD.

In this month’s FT article he looked at the likely impact of President Biden on the markets.

Mr Biden wants the US to rejoin the world orthodoxies, be a good member of global bodies, embrace the green revolution and follow the mantra of lock downs.

As a Biden win became more likely, lockdown tech stocks rallied, despite the threat of regulation.

  • Then when the vaccines were announced, the anti-lockdown stocks (travel, entertainment and even oil).

John expects a tougher Biden response to the virus, but an ongoing challenge in getting the two Americas (his and Trump’s) to coexist happily.

  • Added to this will be more support for the green and digital revolutions, and more monetary stimulus.

I have switched some of the technology investment into more general world shares, and trimmed the successful US-led digital revolution investments. The fund also has a position in index-linked bonds in case in due course the world decides to inflate its way out of debt.

John also has theme fund exposures to clean energy, battery technology, robotics and cyber technology.

Redwood fund 201116

Currency trading

Joachim Klement

Joachim Klement reported on a new study which shows that central banks have effectively killed currency trading.

The most popular anomalies (aka factors) that are traded in the currency markets are the carry trade (buying currencies with high interest rates and selling currencies with low interest rates), Currency factors

Most factors became loss-makers, and loss-makers became profitable:

Value strategies were losing money in sample (i.e. you should have bet against them according to the academic research), but once that fact was known, so many people  started betting against value that the strategy started to work better after publication.

The only factor that continued to work was the carry trade – so long as your pairs didn’t include the dollar.

Currency factor profits through time

Looking at the factors through time, they were profitable until 2008.

Joachim speculates that the new regime is also a contributor to the decline in equity factor performance over the last decade.

Investment trusts

Madison Derbyshire

Elsewhere in the FT, Madison Derbyshire plugged a few investment trusts for the way they have handled the pandemic.

  • But it’s been a turbulent year, as evidenced by the fluctuating average discount to net asset values.

Investment trust discounts

After a decade of contraction to a historic low of 1.3%, the gap jumped to 12% in April (flirting briefly with more than 20% in March), before shrinking back to 7% by October.

  • That sounds bad, but in 2008 many trusts went to a 30% discount, and the average hit 18%

Madison stressed the use of reserves by ITs in order to support dividends:

The capacity of trusts to maintain or even increase payouts to investors when many  listed companies were cutting or axing them has shone a spotlight on the trust  business model, and driven a resurgence in popularity with investors.

Some 58 per cent of the 124 trusts that have reported so far this year have increased payouts, according to the AIC, and a further 23 per cent have held them.

We’ve covered the many advantages of ITs on several occasions, but with the rise in popularity of low-cost ETFs, two stand out today:

  1. Suitability of the closed-end structure for illiquid assets (eg. property, VC, private equity)
  2. Usefulness in accessing esoteric and/or poorly priced markets and asset classes.

I no longer buy ITs in major developed markets, but I still use them for themes and alternatives.


The three trusts showcased by Madison were:

  1. Baillie Gifford China Growth
  2. Hipgnosis song royalties fund
  3. City of London (an income fund)
Velocity of money

The Economist explains that the velocity of money has fallen sharply because of economic uncertainty and government handouts.

Money’s “velocity” is calculated by dividing a country’s quarterly GDP by its money stock that quarter. 

There are several versions of this number, based on different definitions of money.

Most popular with economists is “money of zero maturity” (MZM), which includes assets redeemable on demand at face value—such as bank deposits and money-market funds. 

Velocity of money

In 2Q20, MZM went below one – the average dollar was used less than once from April through June.

  • In June, the Fed had to ration supplies of coins when they remained stuck in wallets and purses.

In a weakening economy, consumers prefer to save rather than shop; investors cling to the safe assets that make up MZM. Both the Depression and the Great Recession began with sharp declines in velocity.

During the Depression, velocity recovered but after the 2008 crisis, the Dood-Frank act moved money from the shadow-banking system to the regular banking system, and velocity continued to fall.

Personal savings rates are at record levels this year, and the money supply is up by more than 20%.

  • Once the pandemic is over, this savings glut could turn into a spending spree, perhaps triggering a repeat of the Roaring Twenties.

It could also lead to inflation, which in turn might finally trigger a rise in interest rates.

Bad year for quants

Last week, we looked at why 2020 has been a bad year for quants, and this week Buttonwood has covered the same topic.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.